|
By David Mager
Deputy Fire Chief
As
a starting point for this discussion of the Incident Command
System (ICS), I would like to offer one of the many definitions
of ICS, this one from the text Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster
Control. An Incident Command System is "the combination
of facilities, equipment, personnel, procedures, and communications
operating within a common organizational structure with responsibility
for the management of assigned resources to effectively accomplish
stated objectives pertaining to the incident." This may
sound daunting and complicated, but there's one key word that
is the essence of Incident Command. That key word is organization.
ICS is a way to organize the resources that are summoned to
any incident. Whether the incident is large or small or whether
it involves one jurisdiction or many, ICS can assist the incident
commander in managing the personnel and equipment being used
in the operation. It establishes an identifiable line of accountability
throughout the organization. It is modular in format, which
makes it simple as well as flexible. When used properly there
is only one person in charge. That person is the Incident Commander.
Furthermore every member of the organization answers to just
one supervisor. This is called unity of command. Each supervisor's
span of control is restricted to a limited number of subordinates,
usually 3 to 5. Most importantly, ICS does not specify the tactics
or strategy that you use. That's up to you.
First,
A Little History
Incident
Command was first established in the early seventies in California
as a response to the massive wildfires and natural disasters
that occurred along the West Coast. In the almost 30 years since
ICS was first used, there has been three major forms that ICS
has taken. First there was FIRESCOPE. This was mainly used in
the west and usually for wildfires. Then Fire Ground Command
(FGC) was created by the Phoenix Fire Department to apply the
principles of the FIRESCOPE system to building fires and the
normal day-to-day incidents of the average fire department.
It was especially applicable to structural fires. In the eighties,
the National Fire Academy developed a form of ICS that attempted
to combine the best of both previous systems. Naturally, there
were some technical differences and changes in terminology.
But, as the saying goes "A rose is a rose is a rose."
And ICS is ICS. There have been other attempts to standardize
ICS. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has developed
a national training curriculum for ICS, which carries a nationally
recognized certification. Most recently, the National Fire Service
Incident Management Systems Consortium has designed a model
procedures guide to ICS that any jurisdiction could adopt for
its own use. This model may be the final amalgamation that evolves
as the national standard for ICS.
ICS For
BFD
The
Incident Command System used by the Boston Fire Department was
formulated in May of 1993. It was updated and revised in 1997.
It is the standard by which we operate at all incidents. It
defines the functions of Command and the duties and responsibilities
of the Incident Commander. It discusses size-up and the selection
of strategic goals as well as tactical objectives. It also outlines
the command staff that will evolve as a major incident escalates.
It explains fireground sectoring both functionally and geographically.
Personnel accountability, our Mayday procedure, and the shared
responsibility of fireground safety are discussed in detail.
These topics will be reviewed in future articles. Until then,
I recommend that you periodically refer to the ICS manual to
become comfortable with its use. Incident Command should not
be equated with checklists and vests. It's definitely not tactics
or strategy. ICS is a way to organize the fireground or incident.
It is a thought process that can become second nature. ICS must
be used and practiced over and over. Practice can include training,
simulations, and its use at even smaller scaled incidents. Practice
your arrival reports, progress reports and command transfers.
This everyday practice will make it comfortable and easy to
use when it really counts.
Points
To Ponder
There
are three points that I'd like to leave you with:
|
- Establish
ICS early in your incident and keep it simple. This
will be the foundation upon which your incident will
rest. If you get off to a disorganized start, you'll
only be chasing the incident. Remember, an incident
can grow smoothly to major proportions if you're using
a workable ICS. And it's only workable if it's known
and practiced by everyone involved.
- Think
of ICS as a toolbox full of tools that you may or may
not choose to use. Only take out the tools you need
for the incident you have. And if you pick the right
tools for the job at hand, everyone's work will be so
much easier.
- Practice
ICS at every incident. Period. You'll have a much better
chance of it working correctly when it matters most
- at the BIG ONE.
|
| References: |
-
Kramer W, Bahme C: Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster
Control, 2nd Ed. Fire Engineering, 1992.
- Brunacini
A: Fire Command. NFPA, 1985.
- Model
Procedures Guide For Structural Firefighting, 2nd Ed.
National Fire Service Incident Management System Consortium,
2000.
- Incident
Command System Manual. Boston Fire Department, 1997.
|
|